Limits On Executive Pay

When the Federal Government bailed out several financially disturb companies in 2009 it caused limits to be put on CEOs and top executives pay. I dis represent that| |
| |there should be limits on pay and those that agree that there should be limits must take into consideration the inequitable practice of the rule, the costless market system | |
| |being affected, and who pop off behind really be stuck paying the bill. [This sentence needs a comma before the coordinating conjunction, “and” that joins two complete | |
| |clauses.] | |
| | To begin, constrictive CEO and top executive pay will non apply to all of the companies that authorized the bailout money. One article revealed that 722 companies | |
| |actually received bailout money, but the CEOs and top executives of only seven companies that received the most money are being affected by the rule. Furthermore, | |
| |there will be healthier companies that decide to endure assistance who can then have this rule waived with skillful public disclosure and a nonbinding shareholder vote | |
| |(Feller, 2009). [Therefore, what? What crystalize of closing sentence could you write here to synthesize this information?



] | |
| | Another reason not to limit pay is that free market systems can be affected as a result of the rule. As an illustration, top executives may want to leave from such | |
| |companies that limit pay and move to other companies in industries where the government is not limiting their salaries. These may be the aforesaid(prenominal) individuals that a firm | |
| |needs to turn the business around. [This is a good point, Arlissa. Nice work!] | |
|...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper