Name of case and docket
Buksa, Ray vs. Sun Toyota Padamsey, Nick Etal
Date of trial
February 13, 2003
Courtroom number
#264
Name of render
D.G. Ingram
Names and occupations of all witnesses
No witnesses at trial
What did the complainant sue for?
$3000.00 Assessment for damages
What was the defendants defense?
The locomotive installed in Mr. Buksas Toyota was properly installed and at not fault of Sun Toyota did the engine neglectdown.
Did the defendant make a claim against the plaintiff? If so, what for?
No counterclaim was made by the defendant.
Summarize the facts and the evidence of the plaintiff, the defendant and other witnesses
The plaintiff Mr Buksa had an engine installed at Sun Toyota, the engine was a rebuilt engine. The rebuilt engine broke down after 3 months and was only on a lower floor warranty by Sun Toyota for 30 days. Mr. Buksa learned that the engine was not installed properly and hence that was the cause of the engine break down. Sun Toyota would not comply with Mr. Buksas plea of installing or fixing the engine without charge. This continued for over 10 months.
Did the parties flummox lawyers? If so what did they do?
The defendant Sun Toyota had a lawyer represent them in this matter.
The lawyer took the case on the gradient of Sun Toyota and basically was Suns voice at the trial.
Describe the role of the judge. Did s/he get involved or remain removed? Give examples.
The judge heard the evidence from both parties. The judge took control and made sure both parties understood the agency fully. The judge also found a solution to the moorage he was presented with. In the case, the defendants lawyer was ill informed and therefore another court date was finally agreed to.
What was the role...
If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment