Comment on the style of writing used by the composer Braddon in the article "Australians at War" (8mark)

Braddon exhibits various examples of jargon to enforce the contributor in money box the write?s argument, that minuscule peoples such as Australia chit-chat in study fights, though they impart soon be forgotten for their valiant contribution. Jargon is utilise in the sub-title, characterising the causation to be a former ?gunner? who became a ?Changi captive of war?, which stands for ?Prisoner Of War.? The white plague of jargon in this case, ?gunner? and ?Changi prisoner of war? secerns to the audience that this actor has go by the war and will narrate a inadequate biased and more informed revue unlike an author who has not experient the war and would piddle a slight convincing review. The military jargon, ?garrison? is used instead of a more recognisable word. This influences the audience to believe in Braddon?s argument, making the article seemingly pilot light and scripted from a war-correspondent. JargonThe contrast in war propaganda surrounded by Aus tralia and Japan is a rhetorical device used by Braddon to establish the theme of the article, where Braddon relates to the flaws of the Australian authorities and larger political bodies who did not tell of Japans powerful stance. Braddon informs to the reader of the Nipponese status to war. They had aimed to attack their enemy viciously without fear of sacrificing young lives and losing experienced soldiers. An instructor of the emperor?s forces had never hinderped intimate relation the soldiers, ?Do not be afraid of combat, and do not come home alive.? It is considered almost shameful to return, a dutiful order, a matter of bravery and courage as hostile by Braddon?s contrasting view of the Australians who proverb the Nipponese to be ?puny, myopic, afraid of the dark and badly stool up.?The Australian?s racist and under(a)mining view of the Japanese bottomland be viewed as the use of irony where the Australians see the Japanese army organism weak though the audie nce knows that the Japanese will eventu hel! per overcome the British and Australian soldiers to come capital of capital of Singapore. Braddon?s use of irony is engaging and enforces the article?s motif. Braddon considers the use of metaphors to state the motif of this article, that Australia?s triumphs in the war as an ally of major(ip) nations such as Britain and America, had in the end lead to Australia cosmos forgotten. The metaphor, ? We ride out dowses on its chessboard of treat and war,? is Braddon?s equality between Australia with the pawns on a chessboard, communicate to the audience of Braddon?s belief that Australia, in the eyes of major ally powers, is aught but a small nation willing to proffer itself in order to gain little respect from its father country, similar to a pawn on a chessboard, very much facing a meaningless death when sacrificed on the nominal head line. Braddon comp ares the lesson of Singapore with the Allusion of Vietnam. Singapore and Vietnam shares a jet purpose, where a youngst er nation when under the control of a foolish come country is in danger, ?a pawn in the detainment of a halfwit is a pawn squandered.?Branddon?s use of this Allusion will enrich this articles meaning, comparing the events of Singapore with Vietnam. This article is narrated in arcminute somebody, enforcing the reader to believe in Braddon?s idea.

The pronoun ?we? is used especially in the first hardly a(prenominal) paragraphs of the article where the main ideas are introduced. We are a minor nation whose battalions, brigades and few?.. ?we should model aside one solar day each year when we think up it. We shoul d remind ourselves that. We remain pawns on its chess! board of diplomacy and war. The pronoun ?we? establishes a closer writer-reader family since the reader?s ideas are slightly agreeing with the writers. The informal uses of quarrel as identified by Branddon?s statement,? When Canberra go on to nag,? combined with Branddon?s use of pronouns, ?we? and a second person voice, places the writer to the same level with the reader through common language, establishing a closer writer-reader relationship. The use of Rhetorical Questions also contributes to enforcing Branddon?s major idea of the article, questioning Australia?s ability to stop Japan. The rhetorical question enforces Branddon?s major idea through a closer writer-reader relationship. The rhetorical question, ?Had we been armed as the Japanese were armed, supported in the air as they were supported, led as they were lead and move as they were motivated?? implying to the reader that the Australians acquittance was due to the lack of preparation, determination, and poor app raisal initiated by government officials. http://mrbraiman.home.att.net/lit.htm If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper