Emerson vs. Thoreau differences

In a separate essay, the writer could be asked to write about the differences between Emerson and Thoreau. This kind of and essay would be referred to as Emerson vs.

Thoreau differences essay. In this essay, the writer would be expected only to talk about the differences between the two characters. Differences refer to contrasting qualities which are directly opposite one another.

The writer of this essay must know the adjectives to use in such an essay. This is because in describing the character of an individual, adjectives take a very central position. The writer must however avoid using general adjectives which do not make precise meaning of what he is describing. For instance, it would not be sufficient to say that Emerson is good while Thoreau is bad.

Good and bad are adjectives that are too general and make very little meaning. A character can be good and bad for different reasons. In stead, the writer should use adjectives that are specific like envious, disliking, horrendous, and unforgiving for negative attributes about Emerson, and liking, soothing, forgiving for Thoreau.

Such adjectives are good because they give specific attributes about Emerson and Thoreau. It is important that as the writer looks at the differences between Emerson and Thoreau, for every positive quality about Emerson, a negative quality about Thoreau should be given. When the writer gives a positive quality about Thoreau, a negative quality about Emerson should be given.

It is not good in such an essay, to discuss the positive characters of a character first then the positive characters of the other character. The rule is simple, for every quality of a character, discuss the contrasting quality of the other character.