COMMON LAW2005 khan Co . and Jones CoWhether or non Mr . khan hindquarters withdraw the abide tendered to Jones CoMr . caravanserai can no thirster withdraw the aim . The trip pop asidebox overshadow or the postal espousal rule applies since the parties , caravan inn and Jones , were communicating through mail . khan wrote Jones about the offer , and subsequently , the new offer . Jones likewise wrote caravan inn about its word senseWhat Khan tendered was a one-party contract , meaning the terms and conditions were specified by Khan , as the offeror , and which Jones , as the offeree , merely had to accept . In this case , however , Jones had already sent out his credenza of Khan s offer forrader Jones received Khan s abrogation of the original offer . By changing the terms of the offer , Khan soundly revoked the original offer and simultaneously presented a new offer to Jones . However , Jones had originally sent out its acceptation of Khan s original offer . The call box rule dictates that Jones toleration , sent before receiving Khan s revocation , prevails and becomes effective to form a valid contract inflictable against Khan (Wikipedia , Mailbox rule 2005In the leading case of Carlill v Carbolic hummer Ball Company , the court rule that nonice of acceptance of an offer which was not received by the offeror was not necessary , as long as the offeree satisfies the conditions set out in the offer . In that case , the court ruled that once the offeree satisfied the conditions contained in the offer , the offeree was authorise to mathematical operation of the contract , with notification of performance of the conditions forming part of the acceptance (Carlill v . Carbolic Smoke Ball Company , 1 QB 256 [1893]Ordinarily , the offeror , Khan in this case , may revoke the offer before acceptance . The Carlill case requires that revocation must take a form similar to that offerHowever , in this case , Khan needful as a condition that acceptance must be through notification within fourteen days .
For Jones to enforce the contract as against Khan , it is required that notice of such(prenominal) acceptance came to Khan s knowledge , otherwise the condition is not deemed fulfilled . Before receipt of such notice of acceptance , Khan may revoke his offer at anytime . In this case , Khan wrote Jones about the offer . Similarly , Khan also wrote Jones about the revocation of the original offer , and in doing so , presented a new offer . If Khan had not tendered its offer via mail , then Jones would be acting at its own risk by tendering acceptance through garner . Then if such were the case Khan would not be bound until the same such acceptance by letter came to his knowledge . Khan would have been able to withdraw his acceptance anytime before he has knowledge of Jones acceptanceUnfortunately , in this case , Khan sent its offer by mail , and Jones was likewise entitled to convey acceptance by mail , following the mailbox rule . Jones validly accepted the offer before Khan could effectively withdraw itThe reason why offer and acceptance must be of mutual agreement...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment