.

Wednesday, 13 March 2019

Lessons in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice Essay

Pride and Prejudice is one(a) of the most popular sweets written by Jane Austen which was branch published in 1813. It is more than a story of fill in which revolves around the lives of the Bennett family and the wealthy potent visitors of Hertfordshire. Its wide variety of personalities in the story contributed to the novels hyp nonic and compelling features which provides several actu every(prenominal)yizations to its readers and their view of kind class, marriage and women office in the nineteenth century which apprise be attributed to from from to distributively one one one roles personality. The Women and Men of the 19th CenturyThe theme towards courtship and marriage is already explicitly stated in the inaugural sentence of the novel. It is a equity universally acknowledge that a single man in self-control of a good fortune must be in pauperism of a wife (p. 3). In this initial sentence, Austen prepares the readers on what to expect. There is a big probabilit y that the story will revolve in a fascinating chase either a husband in assay of a wife or a charwoman in inquisition of a husband. Marriage during 18th century was antithetic compared to how marriage is viewed nowadays. It was a challenging and debat equal to(p) social issue since marriage with love was not a necessity.At that time, marriage consisted of rules and standards that often ignore emotions or relishs. Moreover, connection and family were major participants in establishing marriage. From that first sentence, considering the time the novel was created, the readers would expect a witty tone towards marriage and society The novel likewise visualized several geniuss that are stereotypical in the 19th century. The diverse personalities of each character reveals how the era was like for the author and how the status of nation were inflexible through their wealth, fame and gender.Apparently, the primary lesson that this novel has for its readers is the fact that in t he past love was not a necessary element of marriage. Women were usually seen as absolute wives for men. Nonetheless, in Austens story, she made use of Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcys conflict characters to refuse the kind of stereotypical 19th century setting that the novel was set in. The two major characters, Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy, were clearly different kinds of people who later proved themselves to be the ideal match for each some otherwise.Clearly, the revolution of Elizabeth and Darcys characters were made possible by their own pride and prejudices over against each other. This fact, in that locationfore, illustrates the idea that the character transformation would most likely not lead without the shortcomings and hasty judgments of the two master(prenominal) characters of the Jane Austens famous novel. It was quite ironic though that the novel also conveys the idea that people do steady down in love under the most unexpected circumstances. There is a short line expressed by the female protagonist Elizabeth Bennett which can be considered somewhat explanatory of the whole novel.BooksohNo. I am sure we never read the same, or not with the same feelings (p. 82). This is Elizabeth Bennetts response to Fitzwilliam Darcy when he asked her around her thoughts on books. They were dancing on the junkie of the Netherland Estate and trying to create a conversation. Based on Elizabeths response and her quick dismissals of the topic that Mr. Darcy brought up, her great dislike towards the wealthy new man was evident. This particular line of Elizabeth Bennett is considered an historic line for the novel because it insinuates a symbolic image rather than a literal meaning for the main characters in the story.Her remark about how the topic of books would not be able to create a productive conversation because they in all likelihood would set about not read the same book or have the same feeling towards it depicts that their pe rsonalities mistakable or notcan so far generate different interpretations. Even the title of the book itself can be considered characteristics that Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy both possess, which caused them to yield erratic conclusions about each others personality. The above statement from Elizabeth depicts that the novel originally focuses on the theme of misunderstandings, false impressions, and lapses in judgment.Thoroughly reviewing the whole circumstance of the story, the diverse personalities of the characters are what made it possible to provide the picture of the life-style of English people in the 19th century. Each character is provided a characteristic that is distinct to other characters. Elizabeth Bennett, an raise character thusly, possesses traits which are really much different from her sisters. Here is one of her statements to Darcy included in Chapter 19 where she rejects him the first time he proposed to marry her and considered to be one of the gelid turn s in the story which caused the switch in both Elizabeth and Darcys characterI have no pretension whatever to that kind of politeness which consists in tormenting a respectable man. . . I thank you again and again for the honor you have done me in your proposals, but to accept them is absolutely impossible. . . Do not consider me now as an elegant female, intending to evoke you, but as a rational creature, speaking the truth from her smell (p. 97). Elizabeth Bennetts character speaks much of a strong personality which is passing opinionated and bold. Unlike her younger sisters, she does not allow social status and wealth to interfere with her standards for love.However, in her statement, prejudices toward Darcy are evident for she has already judged him without keen him well first. However, at the end of the story, she regrets having misjudged the man upon knowing the real Fitzwilliam Darcy. This theme of wrong first impression is very common in the personality of Elizabeth Be nnet as she always seem to misjudge a mans intent such as that of Darcy and Mr. Wickham. On the other hand, Darcys character also reveals how wrong he was on his first impression towards Elizabeth.His statement where she declared Elizabeth as tolerable but not beautiful enough to interest him because of her poor social status discloses how high he was to avoid being acquainted with such a woman (p. 9). Similarly, he took back his word when he found out how interesting and intelligent Elizabeth was which led him to confess his feelings and offer a marriage proposal. Unfortunately, his first proposal was rejected. Upon the end of the novel, it is reasonable to conclude that Elizabeth Bennett and Fitzwilliam Darcy actually have similar characteristics which can be considered ironic.Both are intelligent, witty, opinionated, and proud. There are also instances when they have exposed acts of prejudices towards some characters in the story, primarily themselves. Elizabeth deemed Darcy to be an passing arrogant and proud man when she accidentally heard him say that he was not interested in her due to her poor status in the society. She thought him to be a spoiled wealthy man who is unfriendly and selfish. In return, Darcy also showed his prejudices towards her by thinking that she was not right for him because she belonged to the lower berth class part of the society.Hence, the situation indicates how their impulsive and superficial judgments of each other led them to take back their words and eradicate their pride and prejudices towards each other. They gradually transformed into humble beings who were capable of admitting and accepting their shortcomings. Thus, two people, unconstipated with similar characteristics may not have similar outputs and can still be regarded contradictory in terms of beliefs. Like the characters in the story, all have distinct personalities which enabled them to decide the way they did.If Elizabeth did not hastily judged Darcy in the first place which led her into rejecting his first marriage proposal, Darcy would not have humbled himself into further pursuing Elizabeth despite her initial rejection. He would not have rescued her family from social disgrace and reveal his true nature. precisely put, Elizabeth would not have change her opinion about Darcy and most probably reject him still. She would not have fallen in love with him and change her ways of being filled with prejudices.The following scenarios created a huge partake in the maturity and development of the characters in the story which proves that the transformation is indeed dependent on the characters actions and decisions. Upon understanding the difference between the main characters personalities, it is important to note that the focus of Darcy is to win Elizabeth heart to marry her. It is all about marriage from the start of the novel until the end. Austen made it really clear for women in the 19th century how big an issue it was to find someo ne prolific and reputable to marry.Elizabeths mother had seemed to push them into marrying by taking them to social balls where rich men were most likely to come and select a wife. Conclusion Clearly, the arguments stated above identify the concept that Elizabeth and Darcys character transformation would not have been possible without their mistakes and initial false impressions of each other. This validates the fact that their development as individuals is highly rooted from their decisions and hasty judgmentsor rather their own pride and prejudices.In addition, Austens ability to nurture the stereotypes on the characters produced an image of the status of marriage and courtship in the 19th century. It becomes clear to the readers that there was too much consciousness and pressure on the physical attributes and reputations of women than in men. Men were more highly regarded than women as women only(prenominal) seem to serve as partners to men in marriage. The fact that there wer e balls where men can choose the women they want to marry is already an peculiarity of the restraints that society puts on women. They are merely intended for domestic purposes only.

No comments:

Post a Comment