This article is a transcript of the CBS dawning Show. Appearing on the show were Robert Scully, head of the National connection of Police Organizations, and Christopher Darden, former prosecutor in the O. J. Simpson trial and wizard of the ACLU position on race and traffic halt. This article is polished as the first to study arbiter on this issue, be capture the foretoken of opinion between Scully and Darden mirrors the opinions of those who either support or controvert the contention that race affects traffic stops. On the one hand, we restrain Scully who argues that police officers do not stop vehicles without equiprobable understanding and that minorities need to understand stopping someone with probable app bent movement is not a violation of rights regardless of race or scratch color. In response to an ACLU media flow, which features two downcast work force panicking over be signaled to pull over by gaberdine officers even though they puddle done nothing wrong, Scully argues, "I judge it's a little bit outrageous. I think what the ACLU should be doing rather than alarming the black community is educating the black or brown or minority community that being pulled over by police officers really isn't violating your civil rights if they put on probably cause to do that."
Scully argues that the ACLU is sending the wrong core with campaigns like this an
Christopher Darden, on the early(a) hand, thinks media campaigns by the ACLU on the issue are not only when a good method of promoting justice on this issue, and also a valid one. Though he provides no more sources or statistics than Scully does for his contentions, Darden contends that race as a fixings in traffic stops is by no promoter a new phenomenon, "The fact of the matter is that for many, many, many years, African-American and Latino drivers have been randomly stopped without probable cause or any legal justification." Darden argues that this fact undermines the poisonous justice system and police and community efforts to reduce crime and violence.
Darden argues that the ACLU campaign is designed to gather information and statistics on this issue (billboards announce numbers for motorists to call who feel they have been stopped without probable cause) in order for groups like the ACLU to help promote edict to correct it.
The opening quote by Felix Frankfurter demonstrates how the higher up issue plays into politics and justice in American society. In the United States (i.e., a democracy) the courts are designed to administer the law, laws that are sanctioned by politicians and ones supposedly representing the moral sanctions agreed upon by the mass numbers of Americans they represent. Therefore, the above viewpoints on color-establish traffic stops illustrate how far we have to go in this orbit before our laws and law enforcement officials are color-blind. Justice, too, is allegedly blind. However, as we have seen, many law enforcement officials are not. They are tender. Being human they are prone to view minorities as more criminal in potential than non-minorities, often by their own portal and with statistics to back up such perceptions. However, laws should not be deflower by statistics but fair for all regardless of skin color or race. So, too, traffic stops should be based on driving behavior, not skin color. If we look at the above three viewpo
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment