.

Tuesday 6 November 2012

Political Controversies of the 20th Century

No fair-minded individual at the beginning of the second half of the 20th coulomb could have argued that women and racial minorities were receiving their fair slice of the American Dream. In politics, art, business, religion and all other important arenas of American society, duster men had a clear advantage. Women and racial minorities had no find out of gaining socially and culturally important and powerful positions simply because of their draw and/or gender.

Many Americans were troubled by the lack of opportunity, and affirmatory exertion was conceived as a way in which agone discriminatory practices could quickly be put to rights. Simply wait for women and racial minorities to rise to the top ranks of society as washrag men recognized their talents did not seem like a reasonable way to change society. A more proactive strategy seemed necessary, and out of this desire (fueled by the passion of the complaisant Rights movement and later by the women's movement) was born positive achievement.

This does not mean that affirmative action was universally supported all the same in the beginning. There have always been important constituent(a) questions - along with public contro'ersy - over whether, and to what degree, public and orphic institutions may use "affirmative action" or " black eye discrimination" to help members of minority groups obtain better vocation or schoo


Beckwith, F. & T. Jones. (1997). Affirmative action: Social justice or reverse discrimination? new-made York: Prometheus.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

When affirmative action emerged in the 1960s, it was part of a larger quest to achieve real equal opportunity and consolidation throughout American society. But the original purpose of affirmative action changed during the 1970s, from "racial preferences as a temporary bridge over to color-blindness" to

President Ronald Reagan's administration slowed down enforcement of certain civil rights laws and contend government-enforced quotas and "goals and timetables" in part because of growing resentment by whites over what they saw as special and unwarranted treatment of minorities and in part because Reagan administration officials felt that if affirmative action laws were loss to be effective they would have already achieved their goals. (It is certainly problematic that the Reagan administration also urged the lessening of the force of affirmative action because of the bigotry of conservative officials). (Kahlenberg, 1997, p. 87).

"racial preferences as a unchanging way of life" (Kahlenberg, 1997, p. 11).


Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

No comments:

Post a Comment